Archive for the ‘Tween fashion in the news’ Category

Sofiabella in the news…

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Wednesday » May 5 » 2010

Finding a fashionable balance
Mom provides trendy, age appropriate tween clothing

Manisha Krishnan
North Shore News

Friday, April 30, 2010

When Elena Grant’s daughter Sofia hit the age of nine, she started complaining about the lack of fashionable clothing available for kids her age.

“She hated going to school and seeing other kids that were wearing the exact same thing. Particularly, she didn’t like the fact that her cousins who were quite a bit younger, could buy the exact same things that she could buy,” says Grant, a Montroyal area resident.

But at the same time Sofia wasn’t quite old enough to start shopping at stores like Aritzia and Hollister.

So the mother-daughter pair struck a compromise — they decided to head south of the border annually in search of trendy, age appropriate clothing.

“We’d get her completely outfitted and she’d be happy, I’d be happy and it was a lot of fun but every time I went down I thought ‘Why can’t we have this kind of stuff in Canada?’”

Thus, last April she came up with the idea for Sofiabella (www.sofiabella.ca) — a website that sources out fresh and funky clothes for the tween market, creating a one-stop shop for tweens across the country.

“It has to be very good quality; it has to be comfortable, stylish, age appropriate, well priced and just offer really high value to my customers,” says Grant, adding she tries to support North American companies as much as possible.

Lines such as Fluxus, T-bags and Signorelli are among her top sellers.

For spring, Grant has selected a variety of dressy frocks — perfect for Grade 7 graduation — as well as jeggings, tunics and graphic tees.

“All my graphic tees . . . have a positive message on them. They’re just really inspirational and positive messages for the girls to wear like ‘Be as you are’ or ‘Today is the first day of the rest of your life,’” says Grant, adding the same holds true for many of the accessories sold on the site.

Part of the reason Grant says she started Sofiabella was to get away from provocative and inappropriate styles of clothing often seen on young girls today.

“They’re at this age where they’re just sort of figuring things out, figuring out who they want to be and they’re so highly influenced by the images and messages that are coming at them from the media,” she explains.

“Young girls are growing up with this idea that it’s not substance and achievement that matter, it’s outward beauty and overt sexuality that get you fame.”

“I don’t want to pigeonhole these girls and limit their imagination; I want them to dream of possibility and realize that their potential is limitless.”

Zahra Mamdani, owner of Wear Else, is a fan of Grant’s mission and the pair of them have teamed up for the Mums and Little Ladies fashion show at the store’s Fourth Avenue location in Vancouver next week.

Sofiabella and Redfish Children’s clothing (another North Shore-based clothing company) will supply threads for the girls while Wear Else will make sure moms are looking good. “It’s just a chance for moms and daughters to come out and have some fun together,” says Grant.

To attend the show rsvp to event@wearelse.com before May 5. Space is limited.

© North Shore News 2010

Tween fashion in the news…

Monday, April 19th, 2010

What a sick world when women yearn to look like girls… and little girls are dressed to look like women

By Olivia Lichtenstein
Last updated at 11:43 AM on 19th April 2010

When I was a child of seven, one of my most prized possessions was a pair of plastic high-heeled Cinderella slippers with elastic straps and faux jewels. I used to click-clack around the house pretending to be a grown-up.

At the age of 11, I secretly bought a roseprint cotton bra from Woolworths and, in the privacy of my bedroom, wore it stuffed with tissues to see what I’d look like once I had bosoms.

So far, so normal; the average seven-year-old has always snuck into her mother’s room and tried on her clothes, shoes and make-up; it is all a part of emulating your female role model and experimenting with what will happen in the future.

But this was strictly ‘dressing up’ and our childhoods were mercifully free from Hannah Montana, over-sexualised Bratz dolls  -  not to mention the padded bikinis for seven-year-olds revealed on the shelves of High Street store Primark last week.

Where girls of the past had party shoes and a best dress that were just a little more grown-up and saved for special occasions, today’s little girls have an entire wardrobe of clothes more suited to a street-walker than a child.

How on earth did we reach this depressing state of affairs? Is it the mothers, the fashion designers or the media who are to blame for sexualising girls as young as three?

How can mothers fail to realise the consequences of dressing their young daughters in clothes that, at best, over-excite young boys and, at worst, add fuel to the sick desires of paedophiles?

Mothers no longer limit their daughters’ grown-up role-play to the safety of their own homes. This once healthy, private behaviour was part of a psychological process of preparing oneself for the future; now it is imposed on girls by the fashion industry, celebrity culture and parents’ own insecurities.

As a result, our shops are awash with inappropriate clothing for little girls, and mothers collude in this unhealthy trend by dressing daughters in a way that robs them of their innocence and shortens their childhoods.

There is no denying that the boundaries between adulthood and childhood have become dangerously blurred and that many clothes on offer to young girls are downright inappropriate.

We live in a topsy-turvy world where women are desperate to look like girls, while girls crave to look like adult women. In my view, the overall message to men is that attractiveness is inextricably linked to extreme youth.

The storm caused by Primark’s padded bikini top for seven-year-olds last week  -  which resulted in the chain removing them from sale  -  made me wonder whether this was just the tip of the iceberg. I decided to investigate what was on offer on the High Street.

It was bad enough when my now 16-year-old daughter was seven and asking for cropped tops, but the notion of padded bras would have been unthinkable then.

My trawl revealed a horrifying array of sexy clothing on sale to girls as young as three in everyday shops and at affordable prices. I found that shops such as Primark, Bhs and Next, among others, stocked ranges of clothing, which, in my view, are better suited to harlot than infant.

The bikini may be gone, but I found a pink-trimmed padded bra for nine-to-ten-year-olds in Primark, incongruously decorated with monkeys.

Today’s fashion-conscious pre-teen is a paedophile’s dream  -  all the innocence of childhood with the suggestion of womanly attributes. What mother in her right mind would allow her daughter to wear such things?

Primark also offers T-shirts for children as young as two with the words ‘Future WAG’ on the front  -  as though this were a desirable ambition  -  and body-con dresses for eight-year-olds. Clothes like this are designed to cling to curves, insidiously implying a young girl’s future role as a sexual commodity.

When we contacted Primark, a spokesperson told us: ‘The company will review all its products in the light of recent events.’ I only hope this happens sooner rather than later.

In BHS, viewed by many as an old-fashioned, wholesome brand, I found padded, diamante-studded bikinis for nine to ten-year-olds, lacy, pink, padded bras, strapless, figure-hugging dresses for eight to nine-year-olds and tracksuit trousers with ‘Princess’ emblazoned across the bottom.

When I contacted Bhs, they informed me that the padded bikini and lacy pink bra had been withdrawn. As for the strapless dresses, the style will be ‘modified in future to incorporate shoulder straps’ and the ‘Princess’ tracksuit bottoms will be reviewed.

At Next, you can buy strappy pink sandals with a one-and-a-half-inch heel in a child’s size 12 and wedged flipflops with ‘Beach Babe’ on the strap that can be teamed with a fluorescent pink miniskirt available for girls aged four and up.

When contacted, a spokesperson for Next told us: ‘Everyone at Next is sensitive to issues of age-appropriateness within childrenswear.’

The sandals (which are, the spokesperson informed us, ‘a fun item, offered in response to demand for fancy-dress’), the flip-flops (not ‘ inappropriate as holidaywear’) and skirt (‘available from age three to 16 and the length is graduated proportionately to ensure the hem sits above the knee but most certainly not thigh-high’) will remain in store.

‘Inappropriately dressed young girls legitimise the notion that children can be related to as sexual objects’

Other items that I felt were far too precocious include a range of Hannah Montana-branded items in the Disney Store: patent zebra-print boots in size 2-3 with two-inch heels; tiger-print tops and miniskirts and lurid string bikinis for two to three-year-olds.

Next up, I found a New Look prom-style dress with corsetted top and padded bra cups, which could be teamed with peep-toe sandals with two-inch heels. Quite apart from the defined, padded bra cups on the dress  -  which undoubtedly draw attention to the cleavage area  -  the outfit as a whole would look cheap and tacky on a grown woman, so why would mothers dress their daughters like that?

We contacted The Disney Store, Asda and New Look but were unable to get a response.

This week’s Grazia magazine has a feature on the £2million wardrobe of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’s four-year-old daughter, Suri. Fed by her mother’s obsession with American teen show Gossip Girl, Suri wears heels and tailored jackets.

Katie’s favourite pastime is dressing up her daughter. If children are treated as dolls by their mothers, how can they fail to internalise the message of their future role as sex objects for men?

You might say: ‘Lighten up, it’s all harmless fun.’ But is it?

Tom Narducci of the NSPCC, doesn’t think so. He says: ‘These clothes have a strong impact on young girls  -  on what they see as valuable and worthwhile, and how they see themselves as they become young women. If you sexualise kids and teach them to behave sexually, it legitimises the people who want to abuse them.’

Last year, Dr Linda Papadopoulos carried out a review for the Home Office. Her report, Sexualisation Of Young People, published in February, states: ‘The world is saturated by more images today than at any other time in our modern history. Behind each of these images lies a message about expectations, values and ideals.’

Who among us was not shocked by the image earlier this year of Katie Price’s two-year-old daughter, Princess, wearing false eyelashes and full make-up with her curly hair blow-dried straight?

For all Price’s admonitions that it was a bit of fun, can she honestly say that she can control the desires of any passing deviant who is free to view her daughter’s picture now and for ever on the internet?

‘We must teach our girls that the colour of their lip gloss and the shape of their bodies should be way down the list of priorities’

Child psychologist Laverne Antrobus claims: ‘Adults aren’t able to contain their own hang-ups and anxieties, and are now offloading them onto their daughters by impressing on them that they have to look pretty. These days, the emphasis everywhere is on appearance, and this has worryingly moved into clothing for young children.’

Antrobus, who has two teenage daughters, says: ‘When you’re seven-years-old, you don’t need to be judged by your appearance. Children are bombarded with images and face pressures that we as children didn’t have to face. As a result, they are struggling with mental health and depression at a much earlier age.

‘Kids pick up everything  -  all the messages about the need for beauty, youth and thinness. To have value today is all about the external.’

Antrobus is very clear that our children need us to be a parent for the first 16 to 18 years of their life  -  you can be their friend after that. As a parent, the principle of saying ‘no’ should not be lost.

Inappropriately dressed young girls legitimise the notion that children can be related to as sexual objects. Children are being approached and groomed at an earlier age, and this feeds the crime that is paedophilia.

What’s more, a 2009 Home Office survey found links between the sexualisation of girls and violence in teenage relationships, with 20 per cent of boys believing that it is OK under certain circumstances to hit a women if she is wearing revealing or sexy clothing.

Don’t we mothers know in our hearts that it’s wrong to dress our children this way, and that we have a clear duty to protect them from becoming mere sex objects for the delectation of men?

Let us stop pandering to this dangerous trend and dress our daughters as the little girls they are, and let them have the childhood they deserve.

Quite apart from the sheer distasteful nature of the tacky garb on offer, we must teach our girls what’s valuable and worth striving for  -  and that the colour of their lip gloss and the shape of their bodies should be way down the list of priorities.

Are Girls Acting too Sexy Too Soon…?

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Written by Kristen Russell Dobson
Mar 01, 2010
A 10-year-old Tacoma boy confides in his mom about a problem at school. A fourth-grade girl has repeatedly told him that he is “hot.” The boy is mortified and unsure what to do.

A Seattle school library teacher overhears a conversation in the fitting rooms at Nordstrom. Two girls are discussing how much they hate their thighs, wish they had more cleavage, and how “massive” their butts look in certain jeans. As the woman is leaving, she catches sight of the girls. They are no more than 12 years old.

A local second-grader comes home from school in tears. She tells her mother she had to break up with her boyfriend because she caught him cheating on her; kissing another girl. The mother is appalled.

And in Olympia, three middle-school students are formally charged with felonies for an alleged “sexting” incident. They’re accused of sending nude photos of a 14-year-old girl via cell phone.

For many parents, anecdotes like these are becoming too common; they’re worrisome, if not downright frightening. Recent news reports and research about the increased sexualization of children leave parents wondering what is happening to kids these days —and what they can do to stop it.

Trivializing sex

Ask a few experts, ask a few parents, and it’s clear: The media’s to blame for this troubling trend. “There’s a trivialization of sex in our media,” says veteran sex educator Julie Metzger, whose “For Girls Only” class at Seattle Children’s hospital has been a rite of passage for local girls for nearly 20 years. “There is really a tsunami of messages that trivialize women and sex.”

A 2003 analysis of TV sitcoms found gender harassment in nearly every episode. Most common: jokes about women’s sexuality or women’s bodies, and comments that characterized

women as sex objects. And according to the 2007 Report of the American Psychological Association’s Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls, “Massive exposure to media among youth creates the potential for massive exposure to portrayals that sexualize women and girls and teach girls that women are sexual objects.”

Those messages can be harmful to kids because they make sex seem common — even normal — among younger and younger kids. In So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids, co-authors Diane E. Levin, Ph.D., and Jean Kilbourne, Ed.D., write that “sex in commercial culture has far more to do with trivializing and objectifying sex than with promoting it, more to do with consuming than with connecting. The problem is not that sex as portrayed in the media is sinful, but that it is synthetic and cynical.”

The result? “Girls are much more sexualized than they have been in the past,” says Amy Lang, a Seattle sexual health educator and the owner of Birds + Bees + Kids. “There is something that has shifted, and I have to wonder if it’s this message they’ve gotten since they were 8, which is that intimacy is less important than how you look.

“They’re dressing in a way that’s more teenager-like. You see a 6- or 8-year-old girl wearing a miniskirt and tights and 1-inch-heel boots. They’re emulating TV shows that they’re watching.”

Sexy talk

That emulation can produce some pretty upsetting results, as one former Seattleite writes:

“Last week, Kate’s first-grade friends started a ‘sexy club’ at recess. I asked her what that meant to her. She said, ‘I don’t know . . . they dance sexy and chase the boys around trying to kiss them.’ I was worried until she told me this week that they disbanded the club. It was too boring. Then I remembered we used to have a game at recess called ‘chase.’”

Increasingly, what media messages translate into is the kind of playground talk that gives parents and teachers fits. “The language has changed,” says Lang. “The credit goes to the media, the kinds of TV shows and movies that are being pitched to young kids. The language they use to talk to each other is more mature, the kind of ‘sexual’ teasing that happens is also more mature. Which does not mean that they understand it.”

Indeed, it’s most likely they don’t understand it, experts say, and that’s causing a new problem: young children who sound far less innocent than they really are. “They use language that seems very provocative,” says Metzger, “but I think those are kids trying out words that they get exposed to. I think kids need to learn how adults are hearing those words.

“What does ‘dating’ actually mean to a second-grader? It means ‘I like you.’ And second-graders have been saying that for years — it’s a perfectly normal second-grade thing,” says Metzger. “But they are using language that has a certain meaning to us as adults. I don’t think it means that they’re out kissing or having sex in the parking lot. I think it means ‘I sit by you at lunch. I like you.’

”If a child says, ‘You’re hot,’ does it mean that they’re getting too sexy too soon — or does it mean they are mimicking words they’re hearing in the culture?”

“Girls have always chased boys on the playground,” agrees Lang. “There has always been kissing in kindergarten.”

And Metzger says boys in particular get too sexy around language. “I’ve been asked quite a bit recently to help boys around the seventh grade to frame their language so it doesn’t come off as harassment. They say things like ‘You’re so gay’ or ‘You look hot,’ and it’s not at all funny.”

The challenge for parents is to parse the real meaning behind these sometimes shocking statements — and then, don’t get carried away, suggests Briana Bennitt, executive director of Three Cedars Waldorf School in Bellevue. “Parents either overreact and forbid activities connected with normal curiosity — like allowing no play dates with children of the opposite gender — or worse, encourage talk of ‘dating’ and ‘marrying’ — when really, the young children are figuring out the dynamics of having friends of the opposite gender.”

And Levin and Kilbourne write that it’s important for parents to keep sexy talk in perspective; that “as adults get more and more uptight about how the sexualized environment is affecting children, they end up ascribing adult intent to behaviors that would have been interpreted as ‘children just being children’ in the past.”

For older kids, dating may mean more than just talk — but perhaps not much. A 2008 poll by Love Is Respect — the online group behind the National Teen Dating Abuse Helpline — finds that more than one-third of 11- and 12-year-olds (37 percent) say they’ve already been in a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship. What does “dating” mean at this age? For most kids ages 11–14 — about 75 percent, according to the study — it’s a lot of talk. “Fifth grade was the year everyone had a boyfriend for about two weeks,” says Eastside mother of three Elizabeth Huber. “But if they actually had to speak to each other in person, they wouldn’t know what to do! My daughter literally bumped into the guy she was supposed to be ‘going out with’ and was horrified.”

Tween divas

Many tweens who don’t yet care about romance are making their parents squirm with dubious fashion choices — and blossoming penchants for cosmetics.

“[There was] a birthday party my daughter was invited to when she was in fourth grade,” recalls one Seattle mom. “A white stretch limo picked the girls up after school. The car was stocked with feather boas, fake bling and champagne glasses for some sparkling beverage. They cruised Alki, visited a nail salon for manicures and makeup. All I could think was, ‘What are these parents going to do for her 16th birthday?’”

A 2008 report from the market research company NPD Group finds that girls first start using beauty products around the age of 10 — and this number seems to be coming down. In addition, the report says 10-year-olds use more than two dozen different beauty product categories — including cellulite cream! As they have for years, fashion-obsessed tweens pester their parents for the latest labels. “The girls all have their Uggs in many colors,” says Sharon Stypulkowski, a third-grade teacher at Island Park Elementary School on Mercer Island.

Rude ’tudes

What isn’t improving, parents say, is the disrespectful and overly adult attitude that’s prevalent in tween and teen TV characters, like those on Nickelodeon’s “iCarly” and Disney’s “Hannah Montana.” The overall tone, some say, is getting less civil — and that’s showing up in the classroom. “A lot of them know more than they maybe should know at that age,” says Stypulkowski. “I’m seeing it increasing every year a little bit, a certain number of girls value social over academic. Sort of like [the movie] Mean Girls — but at the third-grade level.

“A lot of it is what they’re exposed to — they watch ‘The Hills’ and other shows. Between the media and what they see at home, they’re exposed to a lot more.”

“If you are a 7-year old child,” says Bennitt, “and you are watching media that shows you girls treating each other in a rude fashion, and competing for the attention and approval of boys, the latest fashion, and electronic gadgets — it’s not developmentally appropriate. Girls can easily get the message that what they buy and wear, and therefore how they look, is paramount, while things like character, empathy, intelligence, physical and emotional health are largely ignored.”

Jenny McPherson, an Eastside mother of two girls, ages 5 and 8, agrees. “A lot of times, I’m disgusted by the way they portray females on TV — how they treat friends, the words they use … I don’t see any positive role models. It’s not respectful. Having images of what you strive to be — and having that be it? I don’t want that to be it.”

What to do?

The experts agree: The best way to hold back the “tsunami,” as Metzger calls it, is to manage — and, for most of us, limit — media exposure. “Everything to which you expose your child is an input,” says Bennitt. “In our culture, it’s far too common for parents to not really take charge of that. What it means is that the big business and marketing people are in charge of what is influencing our children.”

Be aware of what your kids are watching — and watch it with them, so you can discuss what they’re seeing. “Children are exposed to information that is beyond their years,” says Lang. “They don’t understand and don’t have ability to process what they’re seeing. Ultimately, it’s very confusing.”

Redmond Girl Scout leader Kate Sorensen recently took her Twilight-crazy troop of 14-year-olds on a tour in Forks, Washington, where the series is set — but not without a few frank discussions about the books’ more teenaged themes, including obsessive love. “I’d say, ‘Do you really think there’s only just one guy for you?’ and they’d say, ‘No!’” Sorensen says. “They weren’t buying into what the books are saying.”

Work to keep media age-appropriate — and stick to your guns, even if other parents are more permissive. “If you can find me a really good reason that an 8-year-old needs to watch a movie about high school, I’d like to hear it,” says Lang.

Decode language, and have frank, age-appropriate discussions about what phrases like “You’re hot” really mean. “Tell them, ‘It’s a grown-up way of talking. “Hot” usually means you’re sexually attractive.’” says Lang. “A child who says this probably doesn’t know what it means; what she probably really means is that she thinks someone’s cute. It’s the parents’ duty is to fill kids in — which means our kids need to know what sex is, starting at around age 5.”

Above all, talk to your kids often about messages they’re seeing — and hearing in songs. Mercer Island mother Carla Barokas talks about a time her three kids — ages 3, 6 and 8 — were singing a popular Taylor Swift song. “They were singing about being 15 and kissing, and I asked them if they even knew what they were singing about. When I told them, they said, ‘That’s gross!’

“I said, ‘You’re supposed to think it’s gross — you’re kids!’”

Kristen Russell Dobson is ParentMap’s managing editor.

Find resources for managing media here.

Tips for counteracting the sexualization of tweens and teens*

Limit exposure to sexual content in media and pop culture.
Use media rating systems to help you decide what media is and is not OK.
Work with your children to develop rules and routines about their TV watching and media use.

Keep up with children’s media and popular culture.
Collect information from the children themselves.
Make sure you look at the most popular items at least a couple of times, so you are able to talk with your children about them.
Learn from and share what you know with the parents of your children’s friends.
Remember that, beyond media, it’s also important to keep up with the real-life experiences related to sex and sexiness, violence and commercialism that children have in the home, at school and with friends.

Get beyond just saying “no.”
When possible, try working out solutions with your children.
When you do need to set limits or say “no,” try to do it in a constructive way – rather than a punitive way (by using your power over children to get your way).

*Reprinted with permission from So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids by Diane E. Levin, Ph.D., and Jean Kilbourne, Ed.D.

Disney Child Star’s Clothing Line Deemed Too Racy By Some

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

FOXNews.com  – February 08, 2010

A line of children’s clothing called Ooh! La La Couture promoted by a young Disney star has come under fire for being too adult, and has even been likened to adult lingerie by some critics.

The Emily Grace Collection is named after 8-year-old “Hannah Montana” star Emily Grace Reaves, who helps design the line.

Her friend Noah Cyrus, 9, has also helped promote the collection in photos and online videos. Noah is Disney superstar Miley Cyrus’ younger sister.

According to the official press release announcing the line in September, the designs feature “versatile styles that can be worn with sweet ballerina slippers, casual sneakers or paired with lace stockings and boots for more of a rock and roll look.”

But the similarity of the clothes to adult lingerie is undeniable, say critics.

Gossip blogger Perez Hilton likened the news of line’s release to the apocalypse, while the Daily Mail called the designs “perverse.”

Promotional materials for the line feature the girls in grown up looks and poses. In one image of Greaves and Cyrus, the girls are seen surrounding what appears to be a stripper pole, and another shows the children posing in leopard mini-skirts that bear a striking resemblance to an adult lingerie piece from LingerieDiva.com.

A rep for Ooh! La La, Couture tells Fox411.com that the clothing line has absolutely nothing to do with lingerie. “Whoever started this rumor grossly misinformed the public, press and media,” Terri Tex of T2 Public Relations told Fox. “I don’t even know where that word or idea of lingerie came from.”

The line has been around since 2004 and is a “reputable, upscale children’s clothing brand,” Tex said. “They do not design or promote a children’s lingerie line, nor will they ever. The Emily Grace Collection is a collection of beautiful tutu dresses created in collaboration with eight-year-old Disney actress Emily Grace Reaves inspired by her Lollipops and Rainbows Foundation.”

Tex also said Noah Cyrus is a “big supporter” of the line as Emily’s best friend, but is not involved in the partnership: “The collaboration with the collection is between Ooh! La La, Couture and Emily Grace Reaves only.”

Celebrity stylist Shaye Strager, who has worked with stars including Brooke Shields and Helen Hunt, told Fox411.com that the fabric and designs are simply “too racy and sexy for the target audience.”

“Capitalizing on celebrity style has been a huge hot-button issue for fashion and there should be something special about ‘coming of age’ and being able to wear more grown-up clothing,” she said. “But typically, girls begin to experiment with this in high school … because these girls are so young, I think they are crossing the line here.”

“Bottom line, the clothing is not appropriate for children of that age,” Strager added.

This is not the first time Noah Cyrus and her parents have come under fire for her choices in clothes.

At a Halloween party last year, Noah wore red lipstick, a lacy black dress and lace-up knee-high boots. At another event, she wore deep v-neck Ramones halter-top. Her sister Miley posed nude from the waist up for Vanity Fair magazine when she was 15, which her father took particular heat for as he was there for at least parts of the photo shoot.

Reps for Cyrus’ parents did not respond to request for comment.

According to Dr. Georgia Witkin, a professor of psychology at Mt. Sinai and a Fox News contributor, the grown-up images the girls are displaying speak to the problem many child stars face.

“When a child mimics the look of a teenager or an adult, they are skipping an entire developmental stage. Most of the values that kids learn in order to be able to handle the challenges of adult life are during the ages of 5-12,” Witkin said. “This is when they learn how to judge and how they are perceived. If they begin to believe that their value is based on their looks or their sexiness, it sends a completely wrong message.”

Witkin said that it is not the clothing that is necessarily the problem, but the potential emotional repercussions of growing up too fast.

“Developmentally, they can’t feel what it means to want to be attractive to the opposite sex. For them, it’s dress up,” Witkin said. “But when they dress like an older sibling, there is the danger that there will be emotions that go undeveloped and unexplored.”

Sofiabella in the news…

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

Elena Grant poses for a photograph amongst clothing for sale from her online business Sofiabella.ca, which sells age appropriate clothing for pre-teen girls, in North Vancouver, B.C., on Monday January 18, 2010. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl DyckClothing fit for a tween: Stylish apparel, without being too grown up
By Tamsyn Burgmann (CP) – 15 hours ago

VANCOUVER, B.C. — Elena Grant knows her young daughter has the smarts and talent to be more than a princess, diva, heartbreaker or flirt when she grows up.
But that’s not what the clothing available for her tween would have the pair believe.
Too big to fit children’s sizes anymore, too young to wear the booty-bearing, midriff-revealing, sexy-sloganed T-shirts and dresses draped over sales racks for older teens, 12-year-old Sofia was in fashion limbo.
Her mother, having spent another evening commiserating with her North Vancouver-area friends about the lack of age-appropriate options for their daughters, decided it was up to her to bridge the gap.
Sofiabella.ca – a one-stop destination for stylish apparel mom and daughter can both agree on – was born.
“It’s a really untapped market in terms of the retailers and designers,” said Grant, who launched her web-boutique in September. “They seem to want the girls to go from size 4 to 6x to dressing like they’re on the way to the club.”
It’s a trend that’s been a part of growing up for decades.
“Girls aspire older, always,” said David Gray, a trend-watcher with Vancouver-based DIG360 Consulting. “A 12-year-old doesn’t want to look 22, but a 12-year-old wants to look 16 or 17.”
Problem is, it can send the wrong message.
“When we as a society think it’s perfectly fine for a nine-year-old to wear thong underwear, what does that tell the nine-year-old? What does that tell the 15-year-old young man? What does that tell the 40-year-old pedophile?” said University of British Columbia professor Elizabeth Saewyc, who holds the national chair in applied public health research focused on youth health.
Youngsters don’t understand the attention they might be inviting, she said, they just want to fit in with their peers. Yet this sexualized focus during puberty can set the stage for eating disorders, depression and earlier sexual activity.
It’s also the peak incidence age of sexual abuse by strangers, Saewyc said.
“It’s important for young people, as they’re developing their bodies and their sexual identity, to have safety and let that opportunity unfold so they can make their own choices.”
Pop singers Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera popularized the racy look among tweens several years ago, Gray said, but stars like Miley Cyrus, of Hannah Montana fame, and Hilary Duff began reversing the trend somewhat. However, the significantly smaller Canadian as opposed to American market means there’s fewer options that filter here.
Several clothing stores that offered designs for pre-teens have also folded in recent years. Adolescent lines by Le Chateau and Jacob no longer exist. La Senza Girl will shut the majority of its stores by the end of this month.
West Coast retailer Lululemon has picked up some of that slack, launching Ivivva, a brightly-coloured, dance-inspired line for girls aged six to 12 last fall.
Grant, who worked as a professional personal shopper for 10 years, thoroughly researches each label she offers, selecting quality clothing in reasonable price ranges. Having the target market living under her roof helps too.
“It has to be trendy,” she said. “But the cuts have to be cut higher in the neckline so they’re not showing a lot of cleavage, they’re cut appropriately in the arms, the shirts aren’t crop-tops, they’re clothes that actually clothe children.”
And daughter Sofia, who once considered the situation “unfair, because I fit those clothes and I was ready to wear them, I thought,” has been convinced.
“Boys will look at you the wrong way.”
Instead of provocative sayings across the chest, Grant stocks T-shirts that read “Most likely to change the world” and “I’m beautiful and so are you.”
There’s definitely demand for that niche market, said Nargas Khabazha, a fashion instructor at LaSalle College International’s Vancouver campus. But there’s a key to its success: “It has to be mother and daughter approved,” she said.
Something mom Shannon Elliot, whose two daughters are 12 and 15, can appreciate.
“As long as it’s modest, I usually go along with what she wants, because at this age they’re really trying to assert their individuality.”
Copyright © 2010 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Related articles
Clothing fit for a tween: Stylish apparel, without being too grown up
The Canadian Press – 14 hours ago
More coverage (1) »

Add News to your Google Homepage

Abercrombie & Fitch’s latest line of graphic tees. Appropriate for teens? You be the judge.

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

OMG!  When did this become okay?  Really, I don’t mean to come across sounding prudish.  As humans we are sexual beings and at 42 (as of last Monday,thank you very much!) I am quite comfortable with my sexuality.  When it comes to my kids though, it’s a different story.  They are kids for such a short period of time.  Shouldn’t they be encouraged to cling to their innocence for as long as possible?  -Elena

Abercrombie & Fitch Pitches New Trashy College Line T-Shirts to America’s Sexualized Youth-From Tellingitlikeitis

Hollister1Hollister2Hollister3

Abercrombie & Fitch is at it again. The “Abercrombie & Fitch pitches new trashy T-Shirts to America’s Youth” headline is creating quite a stir around the internet, and for very good reason. It’s called the Sexualization of Children and Abercrombie & Fitch continues to target American young people with their highly sexualized clothing lines and t-shirts. Abercrombie & Fitch (A&F) has come out with a new line of t-shirts called “New College Tees” with inappropriate, sexualized messages appearing on the t-shirts.

College students may find A&F clothing styles appealing, but tweens and teens shop and spend their own money or allowance at Abercrombie and Fitch too. These tees are not appropriate for any age, let alone tweens and teens wearing such “sexy” smut. Parents would be wise to consider very carefully what department store gift cards to buy as gifts, especially gift cards or clothes from stores such as Abercrombie & Fitch.
Some examples from A&F’s new “Get It On” Fall line of tees:
Tie me up, don’t tie me down
All bed no breakfast
I always end up on top
Anyone you can do, I can do better

A&F also owns Hollister Co. which coincidently has a new “Surf Tees” line that is full of sexual innuendos as well, such as:
Save a wave, ride a surfer
Chicks Dig the Long Board
Sand Jobs are for Surfers
She Goes Both Ways (Beaches & Long Boards)
Ride the Tip
Maybe Partying Will Help
Volley My Balls Please

Yikes!!!

With Halloween just around the corner, it’s time to start looking for age-appropriate costumes for your pre-teen girl. Good luck!

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

My mom rocks!  We joke in our family that she doesn’t really sleep, but rather like the energizer bunny, she just plugs herself in and recharges.  She is a force-smart, creative, multi-talented.  I have to admit that I have never had to purchase a Halloween costume for my kids.  They simply give Lolly (as she is affectionately known) their request by early October and by the 31st, she delivers a hand-sewn work of art.  She never disappoints.  After having read Matthew Philips’ article (see below) I am more thankful than ever!

Halloween Costumes

Little girls’ Halloween costumes are looking more like they were designed by Victoria’s Secret every year. Are we prudes or is this practically kiddie porn?
By Matthew Philips | Newsweek Web Exclusive
Oct 29, 2007 | Updated: 8:27 a.m. ET Oct 29, 2007
Apparently, witches aren’t ugly anymore; they’re sexy. So are pirates and pumpkins and princesses–traditional little girl Halloween costumes that used to say, Isn’t she cute? now scream, That’s hot! with an increasing array of halter tops, bare midriffs and miniskirts. Costume catalogs and Web sites, filled with images of pouty preteens modeling the latest in Halloween fashion, seem almost to verge on child pornography, and ooze with attitude. Witches are “wayward” and grammar-school pirates are “wenches.” A girl isn’t an Army cadet, she’s a “Major Flirt,” and who knew female firefighters wore fishnet stockings? Even Little Bo Peep comes with a corset, short skirt and lacy petticoat.
And while complaints about “slutty” kids’ costumes may seem like a yearly parents’ lament, the industry has been ramping up the sex appeal to ever younger groups of girls. It’s not just 10- and 12-year-olds who have gone Halloween trampy. Now 6- and 7-year-old models are featured in catalogs wearing child-sized versions of skimpy costumes that used to be reserved for adult boudoirs. If you think we’re exaggerating, note that they’re actually selling something called a “Child’s Chamber Maid Costume.” And, many of the tween girls in the photographs are wearing more make-up than Christina Aguilera on awards night. More disturbing may be their expressions–they look as if they’ve been told to give the camera their best “sexy” gaze.

Halloween2

Tack on all the licensed outfits from popular TV shows and toy lines like Cheetah Girls, Bratz and Hannah Montana, and parents are having to search farther a field for something that won’t make their little trick-or-treater look like a lady of the night. But with adolescent girls parading around in short-shorts that say JUICY across the bottom, and every younger girls aspiring to be a diva of some sort, is it any wonder that their Halloween costumes have gotten racier? “No, but it is distressing,” says Joe Kelly, founder of the advocacy group Dads and Daughters. He sees the trend as symptomatic of a deeper issue. “The hypersexualization of younger and younger girls only serves to reinforce gender roles. When an 8-year-old girl can’t find a doctor costume because all they have are nurse outfits, that’s a problem.” Celia Rivenbark, author of the 2006 parental manifesto “Stop Dressing your Six-Year-Old Like a Skank,” has noticed it too, and says that Halloween has become “just another excuse for little girls to dress like sluts.”
This year Americans will spend close to $2 billion on Halloween costumes, nearly double what they spent in 2003, according to the National Retail Federation. With so much money up for grabs, more and more retailers have elbowed their way into the costume market, increasing the pressure to offer a unique take on old favorites. “The idea of vamping up the appeal of the costume is something we’ve seen a lot of,” says NRF spokesperson Kathy Grannis. So while the variety of costumes has certainly increased, they all look more and more alike. Whether it’s a “Midnight Fairy Rock Girl,” a “Scar-let Pirate” or “Miss-Behaved,” chances are if you buy your daughter the costume she really wants, the one all the other little girls are wearing, she’ll show up at the neighbor’s doorstep in a choker collar, high-heels and baring enough skin to give you a real fright.
These new “edgier” costumes are simply reflections of pop culture, says Jackie MacDonald, a costume buyer for catalog giant Lillian Vernon. “Girls today seem to like a little pizzazz. The same old princesses aren’t where it’s at anymore,” she says, before carefully noting, “We don’t want to say they’re sexier, just more confident.”
Not that there’s anything patently wrong with young girls wanting to look pretty. Child psychologists agree that embracing and understanding their attractiveness is a key part of early-adolescent development for girls. But when sexiness and body image become the sole criteria by which they judge themselves and each other, “That’s when we start to see problems,” says Dr. Eileen Zurbriggen, a professor of psychology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who last year chaired the American Psychological Association’s (APA) Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Their report, issued in February, declared that, “Throughout U.S. culture, and particularly in mainstream media, women and girls are depicted in a sexualized manner.”

Halloween3
That shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to anyone who’s watched TV or thumbed through a magazine in the last 50 years. But what might be news is the increasing evidence of the negative impact an overemphasis on body image has on girls’ lives. The APA task force’s team of psychologists linked oversexualization with three of the most common mental health problems for women 18 and older: eating disorders, low self-esteem and depression. And there is evidence that the effect is trickling down the age brackets. “Clinicians are reporting that younger and younger girls are presenting with eating disorders and are on diets,” says Zurbriggen.
Dr. Sharon Lamb, also on the APA task force, has recently coauthored a book, “Packaging Girlhood: Rescuing Our Daughters From Marketing Schemes,” which includes a chapter devoted solely to sexy Halloween costumes. Lamb points out that most Web sites selling kids Halloween costumes divide merchandise along gender lines, and typically offer more choices for boys than girls (boys get to be doctors, police officers as well as gory monsters and “Star Wars” characters). Of the 22 girl costumes featured on one Web site Lamb looked at, 15 were cheerleaders, divas and rock stars. “That really limits girls’ imaginations,” says Lamb, who surveyed 600 young girls for the book, many of whom admitted to dressing up as something sexy for Halloween in order to get attention.
Of course this not the kind of attention most parents want for their pre-teen daughters. But how do you compromise with a kid who’s begging to be a saucy witch when all you want to do is go back to the days when she wanted to be a lion cub or a Teletubby? There’s no easy answer for that question. But even if you can’t talk her into a Hillary Clinton pantsuit, you might be able to convince her that real pirates wear pants.
Find this article at

http://www.newsweek.com/id/62474

© 2007

Tween fashion in the news…

Monday, September 21st, 2009

ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
Thursday, May. 10, 2007

Resisting the cultural forces that objectify young girls
By Colleen Carroll Campbell

When Paris Hilton was sentenced to jail last week for violating her probation,
the hard-partying heiress won yet another 15 minutes of fame guaranteed to
captivate her young admirers. Like her party pals Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan
and Nicole Richie, Paris has parlayed poor judgment and vulgar exhibitionism
into idol status among America’s teen and pre-teen set.

Girls as young as 5 moan Britney’s racy lyrics, while their sisters in
elementary and middle school copy Nicole’s compulsive dieting, Lindsay’s brazen
flashing and Paris’ sultry stare. Young women now are groomed from girlhood to
arouse sexual attention by posting suggestive messages on their personal
webpages and wearing the same risqué fashions as their Bratz dolls. Newsweek
recently chronicled the rise of these “prosti-tots”: girls as young as seven
“who dress like tarts” and dream of breast implants as a high school graduation
gift.

Aspiring young exhibitionists can find role models everywhere these days, from
the coeds who disrobe for “Girls Gone Wild” camera crews and publish
pornographic pictures of themselves in student-run magazines, to mothers who
take pole-dancing classes and wear the same see-through blouses and skin-tight
jeans as their teenage daughters.

Today’s pop culture tells women that sexual power is the kind that counts most
and that they can achieve it by showing skin. That message has trickled down to
girls, forcing them to trade carefree childhood pleasures for sexual
competition.

You can see them in the mall, tugging nervously at their skimpy shorts and
halter tops, straining to see how men react to their little bellies flouncing
out of low-slung jeans. They look more exploited than empowered as they fuss
and cringe, adjust and squirm. How odd that in an age when girls have more
athletic and academic opportunities than ever, girlhood has become a
high-pressure dress-rehearsal for adult mating games.

The American Psychological Association recently issued an alarming report on
this trend, concluding that girls who view themselves as sex objects are more
prone to academic failure, depression, eating disorders, low self-esteem and
poor self-image. They also may be more likely to engage in sexual activity, as
girls who look older tend to attract more sexual attention. That sexual
activity carries risks beyond the physical for girls.

A 2005 study published in the “American Journal of Preventive Medicine” showed
a strong correlation between sexual activity and depression in teenage girls —
a correlation far stronger than the one seen in boys, with girls’ depression
rates rising as the number of sexual partners rose. The study suggests that
sexual experimentation is not a symptom but a cause of depression in teenage
girls.

Many parents feel powerless to resist the objectification of their daughters,
but others are fighting back. A new modesty movement is sprouting in cities
from Denver to Atlanta, with Pure Fashion shows drawing crowds of
modesty-conscious mothers and daughters, new retailers such as Shade Clothing
reporting multi-million dollar sales for clothes that keep private parts
private, and feisty online communities such as ModestyZone.net encouraging
rebels against raunch culture.

The girls and women behind the movement say they are not looking to revive
gunny-sack dresses or relive the 1950s. They simply want to be seen as more
than the sum of their body parts.

Their modesty message is controversial in the era of Paris and Britney. Yet it
also is common sense, as even Paris seems to know. How else to explain her
unprecedented choice of a collar and covered neckline for her recent court
appearance? It seems that even America’s quintessential girl gone wild realizes
that when she wants to be taken seriously, she must stop the striptease and
show some self-respect.

Colleen Carroll Campbell is an author, television host and St. Louis-based
fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Her website is
www.colleen-campbell.com.